Hi! Back to the thyroid in a bit… but I've had a few questions about a study that came out earlier this week so I thought I would do a quick post.
Restriction of meat, fish, and poultry omnivores improves mood: a randomized controlled trial
The Strokes: 12:51 (video starts with an ad. Sorry!)
This pilot study was small and interesting and embarked upon to try to answer some questions about diet and mood. Hooray! Specifically the authors speculate that the arachidonic acid (AA) in meat could impact how we feel, and that restricting AA could make us feel better. AA (which is a highly unsaturated omega 6 fatty acid) is situated in the biochemistry to be pro-inflammatory (though WAPF has some issues with this characterization). Specifically, AA eaten directly competes with the desaturating enzymes for EPA (a long chain omega 3 fish oil constituent), so AA could potentially increase pro-inflammatory cytokines such as TNFalpha which are known to have mood altering effects. One question is does fish consumption ameliorate the affects of pro-inflammatory AA, and is that why populations who eat fish tend to have better moods than those who don't? Hey, let's whip up a little experiment and get informed consent and run it by the IRB and test it.
So… 39 adults who ate meat or poultry once daily (thus omnivorous) with no major psychiatric problems, substance abuse, or health problems were randomized to three groups for two weeks. One group was told not to change their diets (OMN). Another group was told to avoid meat and poultry but to eat fish 3-4 times a week (FISH). The last group was told to avoid all animal products except dairy (VEG). (Traditionally in the US eggs are considered dairy for whatever reason but I'm assuming they were left out as the yolks have a nice dose of AA). Diets before and after were assessed by a "validated food frequency questionnaire." The participants were also given a bunch of mood, anxiety, and depression rating scales before and after.
The results! OMN and FISH groups were about the same with no change from baseline, but the VEG group showed a decrease in the psychological ratings scores with respect to tension and stress (anxiety and depression scores were not significantly changed). Dietarily, if one can truly believe a report to a hundredth of a gram of dietary fatty acids based on food frequency questionnaires, EPA and DHA and AA dropped considerably in the VEG group, OMN group was unchanged, and the FISH group managed to increase their dietary long chain omega 3 fatty acid consumption by 100%. They also successfully raised the O6/O3 ratio by 60% in the diet of the vegetarians, which I'm not enthusiastic about long term, by any means.
Hooray! A result. Decreased tension and stress. But what does it mean? I'm hoping this pilot trial is used as evidence to recruit funding for a bigger and more ambitious trial, because what these researchers did not measure is pretty much everything that would tell us anything about what actually happened to decrease those stress scores. There were no measures of tissue fatty acids to tell us how the ratios changed in the body relative to these dietary changes, and no "after" measures of weight. Losing weight from a diet is associated with improved psychological scores, and since vegetarian-geared fare is often healthier than the regular SAD meaty counterparts (tofurky and cheese pizza excepted), I wouldn't be surprised if the most dramatically altered diet caused more weight loss than the others. Or it might have to do with changes in AA. The Seventh Day Adventists study (which the authors if this study did as well!!) showed that "Vegetarian Diets Are Associated with Healthy Mood States."
(My critique of the SDA studies are that being part of a close-knit community that is very pro-vegetarianism is a HUGE confounder when it comes to mood and stress, and boy, it sure would be nice to know the tissue levels of fatty acids because that would tell us a lot more than just food frequency questionnaires and psych scales.)
We need more info to make anything of this little study. I also think the title is misleading (and is leading to misleading news reports, as is typical), as actual mood and anxiety scores were unchanged, only the tension and stress scores (though certainly over the long term tension and stress are associated with more depressed and anxious mood states). Whatever gets you funding, I suppose…
I saw that and was thinking of sending it to you but 1. It is very limited, like you said: "what these researchers did not measure is pretty much everything that would tell us anything about what actually happened to decrease those stress scores" (you're quotable!) and 2. You are omniscient and knew about it already (and I'm omniscient because I know that you're omniscient).ReplyDelete
I agree for the most part. I think that if you tell people to go on a vegetarian diet they will spontaneously cut out all of the fast food and go eat food that they weren't eating before and resolve some nutrient deficiencies like...say...magnesium, which is plausible to us both. Now if they had done a dietary analysis we would be able to check that but they didn't.
There are also other explanations that either fall into the wild-and-crazy-speculation-about-physiology or wild-and-crazy-armchair-psychology categories, but I need to keep that junk instead my head where it belongs. I'm also waiting for the next trial. Hopefully it doesn't have any flaws in it.
This was a pilot study, so I'm not sure it has much validity for the rest of us who don't fly airplanes.ReplyDelete
That settles it - I'm going vegan.
PS: I'm looking for the time to review a recent article on the dietary sodium/potassium ratio, which is linked to longevity and cardiovascular disease. The paleo diet should move the ratio in the right direction (lower sodium, higher potassium) compared to the SAD.
Meatless = > Less Tense in the Short Term => Past Tense in the Long TermReplyDelete
Sodium/potassium ratio??? I suppose this passes for a more holistic scientific approach?ReplyDelete
What's the time frame for the possible interference between AA & EPA? If taking O3 caps with eggs = bad, would eating eggs in AM and gobbling O3s or fish in PM make any difference?ReplyDelete
I don't think that dietary arachidonic acid increases inflammation at all, there isn't any evidence for it. Some people just assume that because metabolites of arachidonic acid are pro-inflammatory then dietary arachidonic acid will get turned into these metabolites willy nilly and lead to massive chronic inflammation. But it's not so http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22188761ReplyDelete
That's what we want, just one substitution with a supplement not a "low arachidonic acid diet" where they make many changes or whatever, and certainly not epidemiology, we want this experiment which is perfect. If I could do the Japan bow thingy to those researches I totally would.
So eat your eggs, they might even have benefits http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20440721 (in mice but I'm kind of mousey sometimes!)
I already believed that theory to be bunk because of my personal experience of eating eggs and having a CRP measurement of 0.1mg/dl. And we really know in that study that arachidonic acid doesn't change inflammatory markers because their baseline CRP not only didn't change but was completely optimal. Those Japanese dudes are healthy! :-)
So it looks like the arachidonic acid---> inflammation hypothesis isn't right, and we need to look elsewhere to explain the changes. I'm still siding with the lack of big macs (or fish fillet?!) and more vegetables and fruits on the vegetarian diet providing more of the nutrients that people are lacking the most.
By the way, I was just reading and realized that there is another possible explanation...good ol' vitamin c http://www.wellnessresources.com/health/articles/vitamin_c_boosts_mood/ReplyDelete
Or the best explanation, both. Potassium too, it makes me feel good. Obviously we don't know what the dietary changes are, but we have a pretty simple alternative explanation for the results.